
We
can build a better transit network, serving city cores, connecting suburbs, and
encouraging dense growth that combats sprawl and preserves the environment. This
was a key theme emerging out of Railvolution 2011, a yearly conference that began in
Portland in 1989 dedicated to transit and the communities it serves. The
know-how is there for a revitalized, transit- oriented society, the thinking in
planning circles is there, changing demographics and social expectations are
ripe for it. One element, though, is too often lacking: governance. Part of
this is political will, part a conflict of interests; yet a large part of the
problem is simply the cumbersome machinery of local, state, and federal
government. (Indeed, this could be said to mirror international response to
environmental issues, which is hindered by individual countries and powerful
interests and a weak, dysfunctional system of global governance.)
The
Washington, DC region—where this year’s Railvolution took place—could serve as
a paradigm for how fragmented governance undercuts transit and growth policy. (Full
disclosure: I am Transit Chair of the Montgomery County (Maryland) Sierra Club,
and therefore an extremely interested party.) A forum titled “The Jobs-Housing Balance in Metropolitan DC: Undividing a
Region” revealed the area’s dysfunctionality. Home to an array of experts, the
DC region would seem ideal for effective planning. The region introduced one of
America’s premier metro rail systems in the 1970s and began to lay the
groundwork for compact, environmentally friendly development. It has also been the
site of some of the most innovative plans to promote dense growth around
transit networks and prevent sprawl, notably in Arlington, Virginia and in
Montgomery County, Maryland (for further discussion, see the recently published
SSPP article, “A
functional integrated land use-transportation model for analyzing
transportation impacts in the Maryland-Washington, DC Region“ part of the
forthcoming Forum on Transportation and
Land Use in the Maryland Suburbs of Washington, DC (Fall
2011)).
Yet
sprawl has tumbled outward to the far suburbs and the region is home to some of
the country’s worst traffic. Why? My provisional answer is poor and fragmented
governance. The region is home to one of the most dysfunctional governance
systems imaginable, divided between two states, Maryland and Virginia, as well
as the District of Columbia. No strong central authority is available to make
or carry out plans. The closest is the Metropolitan Washington Council of
Governments (MWCOG), which acts as a planning forum for the region. Unfortunately,
it has no actually governing power, relying on the good faith of the states and
localities to implement its plans.
In
DC, then, as much as anywhere on the planet, local, corporate, state, and
national authorities make decisions based on their own perceived needs. At the
forum, Stewart Schwartz of the Coalition for Smarter Growth spelled out some recent
bad decisions. The giant corporation Northrop Grumman chose a beltway location—transit
hell—for its new headquarters when it could easily have picked far friendlier
Arlington County—transit heaven. Montgomery County, in conjunction with Johns
Hopkins University, is developing a giant science complex away from the Metro,
on the already overcrowded I-270 corridor in the west, rather than picking a an
underdeveloped Metro station to the east, where jobs are needed. The region is
also subject to the whims of the federal government: the Department of Defense
is in the process of moving bases and hospitals away from transit-friendly core-city
locations into sprawling parts of Virginia and Maryland, a process Schwartz
characterizes as “the worst land-use decision our government has ever made.”
Besides
sprawling outward, the region is also divided economically, with the majority
of jobs in Fairfax County and western Montgomery County and housing, especially
affordable housing, to the east, in Prince George’s County, and in DC itself
south of the Anacostia River. The division creates long, congested commutes. Yet
little has been done to alleviate the situation despite its documentation as
far back as 1999 by the Brookings Institution in a report entitled “A Region Divided: The State of Growth in Greater Washington,
D.C.” Aubrey Thagard, a development official for Prince George’s County,
describes the area as “abundant in transit resources,” including fifteen Metro
stations and two commuter rail lines which remain severely underdeveloped. Dense
development around these transit centers is an obvious way to combat sprawl and
make way for the influx of people that continue to arrive in the region. It
hasn’t happened, due to a combination of racial and economic fears regarding
the primarily African-American county, as well as corruption at the county level.
Fortunately, Prince George’s has just elected new officials who seem to promise
far cleaner governance and better decision making. Thagard describes the
development of New Carrollton, a key intersection of transit options including
a Metro and commuter rail line, as “probably one
of the largest transit-oriented developments on the eastern seaboard.”
In addition, the entire region has developed a
plan to integrate growth, as explained by long-time smart growth advocate Harriet
Tregoning of the Washington, DC Office of Planning. Called Region Forward, the
plan provides goals and targets for land use, housing, energy, the environment,
health, education, and, of course, transportation. Tregoning describes the
paradigm of drivers versus bikes versus transit as “so twentieth century”; the
twenty-first-century region needs to do it all, with frequent modal shifts for
most citizens. Unfortunately, she explains, “not everyone has a choice,” since growth
hasn’t accommodated these different modes, adding that land-use planning in the
region ranges from “excellent to awful.” In other words, planning has occurred
too often on a local basis, resulting in an unwieldy patchwork, a situation
that Region Forward aims to change.
One key element of Region Forward is the numerous
metrics that provide for monitoring, measurement, and feedback to local and
regional governments. The need for metrics, and the amazing ability of
twenty-first century technology to provide them, was a recurring theme of
Railvolution 2011. Countering these new technologies, however, is the lack of
enforcement mechanisms for Region Forward. Although all 21 county and municipal
governments signed on to these plans, there’s no guarantee
that they’ll actually follow through. The metaphor of herding cats springs to
mind, although that metaphor assumes an actual cat herder, which is lacking
here. Still, given the stated regional commitment, the recent dominance of at
least the rhetoric of smart growth, and (perhaps most important) the lack of
money to provide the roads and infrastructure that characterize sprawl, there
is reason for hope.
Zooming back to a more global perspective
(something that should be easy for users of Google Earth), the DC region might
be a test case for international coordination. We need better governance and
integrated planning. Regarding the environmental crisis, the know-how and
technology exist for a true international response, but the governance is insufficient,
to be generous. Instead, numerous actors—both countries and multinational
corporations—look out for their own interests. Of course, in the long run the
common interest trumps the individual interest, but it’s hard to get the actors
to realize this unfortunate outcome. Still, some governments of some countries,
many nongovernmental organizations, and even some individuals and departments
within big corporations do keep an eye on the larger picture, on the common
good. We will see if, in its haphazard, zig-zagging manner and spurred by an
ongoing economic and environmental crisis, the DC region actually follows the
Region Forward map to create a better future. If so, perhaps there is hope that
the planet can do so?
Excellent insights. At another recent transportation conference, I was stunned to see how quickly New York City had expanded its bike network and asked how it had happened. "Three reasons," the presenter explained. "Leadership, leadership, leadership." I believe Fairfax County, to name just one local government, suffers because it is run by a committee (of supervisors). There is a way to start over with the redevelopment of Tysons Corner - where the best option is to make it a city and elect a single mayor.
ReplyDeleteNo doubt, fragmented government has not been helpful to the region's efforts to support rational land use. But areas without fragmented government have suffered the same fate. As "Deep Throat" told Woodward & Bernstein, "Follow the money." In other words, economic incentives are key factors that are often overlooked in the sprawl equation.
ReplyDeleteSome jurisdictions have begun the task of ending subsidies for sprawl while reducing penalties for infill development. Internalizing externalities is key -- and this can be accomplished through an array of policies that include reform of the mortgage interest deduction, parking pricing, value capture and property tax modernization.
For more information on these techniques, see http://www.justeconomicsllc.com